However, Julie did not specify which minister’s family member received this appointment, only stating that a minister’s son was appointed despite the rules.The uproar in the House intensified, leading to the scuffle with marshals and the adjournment of proceedings.After the uproar, Julie addressed the media and asserted, “CrPC ended in the country on June 30, and the Indian Civil Security Code (BNSS) came into force on July 1. This means that after July 1, citizens and police in the country are bound to follow this new code. However, the state advocates have been appointed in 12 districts by the Law Secretary, Government of Rajasthan, under Section 24(2) of CrPC, whereas the appointment should have been made under Section 18 of BNSS.”With the ruling BJP and the opposition MLAs adopting tough postures, this logjam in the Assembly may take a lot of effort to be resolved. An air of suspense and uncertainty prevails at the Rajasthan assembly.
Source link
