The petition alleged that Singhania and her family had failed to disclose the child’s whereabouts. Singhania initially claimed the boy was with her uncle, Sushil Singhania, but he later denied knowledge of the child’s location. The court then asked the Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, and Haryana governments for clarity on the situation.The court noted the boy had spent minimal time with his grandmother, with Justice Nagarathna remarking, “Sorry to say, the child is a stranger to the petitioner.” The bench clarified that custody would ultimately need to be determined by an appropriate lower court.Subhash and Singhania, married in 2019, had their son in 2020. Nikita Singhania left their Bengaluru home in 2021 following an altercation and filed a case against Subhash and his family in 2022.After two years of disputes, Atul Subhash died by suicide on December 9 at his Bengaluru residence. In an 81-minute video and a 24-page suicide note, he accused Singhania and her family of extortion and filing false cases to demand Rs 3 crore. He also criticised the justice system for being biased in favour of women, sparking debates about the misuse of laws designed to protect women.
Source link
