On Monday, the Apex Court found substance and merit in Annamalai’s appeal and allowed it.During the hearing, the Supreme Court, while granting relief to Annamalai, observed that on the face of it, Annamalai’s remarks do not constitute the offence under section 153-A (Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race etc), of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). It thereby granted him relief of staying the trial courts proceedings against him. Justice N Anand Venkatesh of the Madras HC, while dismissing Annamalai’s plea, in his order, had on February 08, said that the TN BJP chief’s alleged pre-Diwali remarks against a Christian NGO in connection with the bursting of crackers were prima facie aimed at inflaming communal tension.The HC judge, dismissed Annamalai’s plea, after relying on one of the apex court’s orders to flag the potential of hate speech to act as a ticking bomb. In his defence, Annamalai, however, claimed that his comments had not caused any disturbance to public tranquility so far, and he is innocent in the case. According to the prosecution, Annamalai, in an interview with a YouTube channel just two days before the 2022 Diwali, had allegedly made certain divisive remarks that a Christian NGO was behind a legal challenge in the Supreme Court to the bursting of crackers during the festival in its bid to attack the Hindu culture.
Source link
