By Online Desk
The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued a notice to the Lok Sabha secretary general on Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader Mahua Moitra’s plea challenging her expulsion from the Lower House last month. The court has asked the official to file a reply within three weeks.
Lawyer Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Moitra, urged the top court to allow her to participate in the Lok Sabha’s proceedings, which was rejected by the bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta. They remarked that allowing it would be like allowing the main petition.
When Singhvi urged the justices to fix the date of the hearing a little earlier, such as in February, citing the upcoming Budget session, the bench refused.
They said they would hear Moitra’s plea against her expulsion from Lok Sabha in the week commencing from March 11.
“We will not get into the multiple issues that arise with judicial review at this stage. Let a reply be filed by the first respondent (Lok Sabha Secretariat) in three weeks, List (next hearing) on week commencing March 11,” the SC bench said in its order.
The top court also refused to issue any notice to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and the Committee on Ethics of Lok Sabha — both were made a party by Moitra in her plea.
Meanwhile, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Lok Sabha secretary general, requested the court not to issue a formal notice and said that he would file a reply to Moitra’s petition. He added that the top court should not venture into the internal matter of discipline in the sovereign organ of the state.
Background
In October last year, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Nishikant Dubey, on the basis of a complaint submitted by SC lawyer Jai Anant Dehadrai, alleged that Moitra had asked questions in the Lok Sabha in exchange for cash and gifts from businessman Darshan Hiranandani to mount an attack on industrialist Gautam Adani and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
In an affidavit to the ethics committee of the Lok Sabha on October 19, last year, Hiranandani claimed that Moitra had provided him with her login ID and password for the Lok Sabha members’ website.
The ethics committee found Moitra guilty of “unethical conduct” and contempt of the House as she shared her Lok Sabha members’ portal credentials — user ID and password — with unauthorised people, “jeopardising national security”.
On December 8, after a heated debate in the Lok Sabha over the ethics committee’s report, during which Moitra was not allowed to speak, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi moved a motion to expel the TMC MP from the House for “unethical conduct,” which was adopted by a voice vote.
READ | Mahua Moitra’s political odyssey: From banker to parliamentarian and the explosive exit
Following her expulsion in the “cash-for-query” row, Moitra hit out at the ethics panel for “acting without proof” and said it was becoming a “weapon” to “bulldoze” the Opposition. She alleged that the Ethics Committee and its report “broke every rule in the book”.
Moitra has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and claimed that she was being targeted as she had raised questions on the deals of the Adani group.
She moved the apex court seeking enforcement of her fundamental rights recognised by the Constitution. “The ethics committee order is unfair, unjust and arbitrary,” her petition had said.
The ethics committee had also recommended a legal and institutional inquiry be initiated by the government with a set deadline. The Central Bureau of Investigation has already filed a preliminary FIR in the case.
(With inputs from Suchitra Kalyan Mohanty & PTI) Follow channel on WhatsApp
The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued a notice to the Lok Sabha secretary general on Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader Mahua Moitra’s plea challenging her expulsion from the Lower House last month. The court has asked the official to file a reply within three weeks.
Lawyer Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Moitra, urged the top court to allow her to participate in the Lok Sabha’s proceedings, which was rejected by the bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta. They remarked that allowing it would be like allowing the main petition.
When Singhvi urged the justices to fix the date of the hearing a little earlier, such as in February, citing the upcoming Budget session, the bench refused. googletag.cmd.push(function() {googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2′); });
They said they would hear Moitra’s plea against her expulsion from Lok Sabha in the week commencing from March 11.
“We will not get into the multiple issues that arise with judicial review at this stage. Let a reply be filed by the first respondent (Lok Sabha Secretariat) in three weeks, List (next hearing) on week commencing March 11,” the SC bench said in its order.
The top court also refused to issue any notice to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and the Committee on Ethics of Lok Sabha — both were made a party by Moitra in her plea.
Meanwhile, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Lok Sabha secretary general, requested the court not to issue a formal notice and said that he would file a reply to Moitra’s petition. He added that the top court should not venture into the internal matter of discipline in the sovereign organ of the state.
Background
In October last year, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Nishikant Dubey, on the basis of a complaint submitted by SC lawyer Jai Anant Dehadrai, alleged that Moitra had asked questions in the Lok Sabha in exchange for cash and gifts from businessman Darshan Hiranandani to mount an attack on industrialist Gautam Adani and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
In an affidavit to the ethics committee of the Lok Sabha on October 19, last year, Hiranandani claimed that Moitra had provided him with her login ID and password for the Lok Sabha members’ website.
The ethics committee found Moitra guilty of “unethical conduct” and contempt of the House as she shared her Lok Sabha members’ portal credentials — user ID and password — with unauthorised people, “jeopardising national security”.
On December 8, after a heated debate in the Lok Sabha over the ethics committee’s report, during which Moitra was not allowed to speak, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi moved a motion to expel the TMC MP from the House for “unethical conduct,” which was adopted by a voice vote.
READ | Mahua Moitra’s political odyssey: From banker to parliamentarian and the explosive exit
Following her expulsion in the “cash-for-query” row, Moitra hit out at the ethics panel for “acting without proof” and said it was becoming a “weapon” to “bulldoze” the Opposition. She alleged that the Ethics Committee and its report “broke every rule in the book”.
Moitra has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and claimed that she was being targeted as she had raised questions on the deals of the Adani group.
She moved the apex court seeking enforcement of her fundamental rights recognised by the Constitution. “The ethics committee order is unfair, unjust and arbitrary,” her petition had said.
The ethics committee had also recommended a legal and institutional inquiry be initiated by the government with a set deadline. The Central Bureau of Investigation has already filed a preliminary FIR in the case.
(With inputs from Suchitra Kalyan Mohanty & PTI) Follow channel on WhatsApp
