The petitioners have also alleged that the terminated teachers’ employment and salary codes remain active, indicating possible misappropriation of state funds by corrupt officials. They report severe hardships, with over 170 teachers having died due to lack of basic sustenance, and many others having tragically committed suicide.The Supreme Court’s decision acknowledges the complexities of the case and deems it appropriate for the Tripura High Court to reconsider the matter. This development gives the petitioners an opportunity to present their case and seek redress for their grievances.The High Court’s 2014 verdict had declared the Employment Policy of 2003 issued by the State Government as “bad in law,” leading to the termination of over 10,000 teachers, including those currently petitioning. Nayak argued that the policy was not applicable to their recruitment, which was conducted in strict adherence to recruitment rules.Lead petitioners Subhash Sinha and Mased Miah questioned the applicability of the policy and urged the Supreme Court to restore their appointments promptly. They also claimed that a massive scam was being perpetrated by the state government, with the employment and salary codes of the terminated teachers still active, leading to possible misappropriation of state funds.The petitioners have highlighted the dire situation faced by the families of these teachers, many of whom are struggling with daily expenses and other difficulties. The shortage of teachers in Tripura’s schools is also noted, raising concerns about the impact on students’ education.The Principal Accountant General (Additional) Tripura is reportedly investigating the alleged fraud. The petitioners and their advocates remain hopeful that the High Court will address these issues and provide a fair resolution.
Source link
