Lawyer pursuing Bofors case claims threat to life, files FIR-

admin

Firepower enhanced along LAC in Arunachal-


By PTI

NEW DELHI: A lawyer who has been pursuing the politically sensitive Rs 64 crore Bofors pay-off case has filed a complaint with Delhi Police claiming that he received life threats in an anonymous letter.

Advocate Ajay Agrawal claimed that the letter, received on December 31, was sent by an ordinary post and there was no address of the sender on it “The letter said that he (Agrawal) and his family would face serious consequences if he did not withdraw the case he is pursuing in the Supreme Court,” the lawyer said.

Agrawal on December 25 had filed an application in the Supreme Court seeking an early hearing on a petition challenging the Delhi High Court’s 2005 verdict which quashed all charges, including against the Hinduja brothers, in the case.

He said the apex court had on November 2, 2018, dismissed the CBI’s plea against the high court verdict and had said the probe agency can raise all grounds in the appeal filed by him against the same judgement.

Agrawal said he had filed the petition in the top court against the high court verdict in 2005 itself and over three decades have gone by since the matter came to light.

The high court in its 2005 judgement had quashed all charges against the three Hinduja brothers — S P Hinduja, G P Hinduja and P P Hinduja — and the Bofors company.

Before the 2005 verdict, the high court had on February 4, 2004, exonerated former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi in the case and directed the framing of charge of forgery under section 465 of the Indian Penal Code against Bofors company.

The Rs 1,437-crore deal between India and Swedish arms manufacturer AB Bofors for the supply of 400 units of 155 mm Howitzer guns for the Indian Army was entered into on March 24, 1986.

Swedish Radio on April 16, 1987, had claimed that the company had paid bribes to top Indian politicians and defence personnel.

The CBI on January 22, 1990, had registered the FIR for alleged offences of criminal conspiracy, cheating and forgery under the Indian Penal Code and other sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act against Martin Ardbo, the then president of AB Bofors, alleged middleman Win Chadda and the Hinduja brothers.

It had alleged that certain public servants and private persons in India and abroad had entered into a criminal conspiracy between 1982 and 1987 in pursuance of which the offences of bribery, corruption, cheating and forgery were committed.

The first charge sheet in the case was filed on October 22, 1999, against Chadda, Italian businessman and alleged middleman Ottavio Quattrocchi, the then defence secretary S K Bhatnagar, Ardbo and the Bofors company.

A supplementary charge sheet was filed against the Hinduja brothers on October 9, 2000.

A special CBI court in Delhi on March 4, 2011, had discharged Quattrocchi from the case, saying the country could not afford to spend hard-earned money on his extradition which had already cost Rs 250 crore.



Source link