In a separate interview with the New York Times, Balaji had described OpenAI’s method of data collection as “harmful.” “If you believe what I believe, you have to just leave the company,” he said, expressing concern over the training of GPT-4 on massive amounts of internet data.Balaji was particularly concerned about generative AI systems creating outputs that directly competed with the original copyrighted works used in their training. In a blog post cited by the Chicago Tribune, he stated, “No known factors seem to weigh in favour of ChatGPT being a fair use of its training data.” He also emphasized that this issue was not limited to OpenAI alone, adding, “Fair use and generative AI is a much broader issue than any one product or company.”The lawsuits against OpenAI, including those filed by prominent media outlets such as The New York Times, allege that the company’s practices violate copyright laws. Balaji was cited in court documents as possessing “unique and relevant documents” that could support these legal actions.OpenAI has continually denied the accusations. In a statement reported by the Chicago Tribune, the company stated, “We see immense potential for AI tools like ChatGPT to deepen publishers’ relationships with readers and enhance the news experience.”The death of Balaji has reignited debates surrounding the ethical and legal ramifications of AI technologies.
Source link