By PTI
NEW DELHI: The Common University Entrance Test (CUET) based on multiple choice questions over the decades-old subjective entrance test pattern — academicians are raising doubts over the new examination pattern for post-graduate admissions in Jawaharlal Nehru University.
Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), which sees cutthroat competition in admissions to its masters programmes, fears that the multiple choice questions (MCQ) based test pattern will dilute the quality of students attracted by the varsity.
According to JNU Vice Chancellor Santishree Dhulipudi Pandit, the university has been appealing to the Centre to change the CUET format for postgraduate admissions.
“For masters programmes, we need to test the overall understanding of the subject, opinions and critical thinking besides knowledge. The MCQs have a different testing pattern and aptitude,” she said.
The JNU Teachers Association (JNUTA) had recently moved a resolution demanding that the university suspends its agreement with the National Testing Agency (NTA) and immediately restore JNU’s own time-tested admission procedures.
Previously, the varsity used to admit students to undergraduate courses through subjective exams conducted by it.
From 2019 however, it started admitting students through the JNU Entrance Examination conducted by the NTA.
The university announced earlier this year that it would conduct admissions to all undergraduate and postgraduate courses through the CUET.
“We also need to take into account the unique nature of the university and peculiarity of different centres and the courses offered by them. There is a reason why the university attracts the best talent from across the country and its the selection process,” JNU Professor Bishnupriya Dutt said.
“If we have to provide a level playing field to everyone, CUET-PG can be a subjective exam but to test aspirants of Masters Programmes on basis of a MCQ based exam is not the right metric,” she said.
JNU professor Ayesha Kidwai said that the university had its own entrance test system, which used to analyse students on the basis of their writing skills and their opinion-making capacity.
“JNU has been in existence for over 50 years and the university was holding its entrance for nearly 48 years before the former VC M Jagadesh Kumar, who is now UGC chairman, brought in the JNU Entrance Exam (JNUEE) by tying up with the NTA.
The move not only meant that we lost out on good students but NTA also charged three times the money the university would spend on holding the exam.
“The university, when it was conducting its own exam, also used to make a profit of Rs 1.5 crore, which would then be used by the university tto give Merit Cum means Scholarship to students,” she said.
Kidwai said that the VC should call an Academic Council meeting and withdraw from CUET and she will get the support of the entire teaching community.
The CUET-PG is the new common entrance test for admission to postgraduate programmes at Central universities.
As many as 66 universities, mostly Centre-run, have adopted the computer-based CUET-PG for admissions in the academic session 2022-23.
It will be held in two shifts each on September 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11 in around 500 cities in India and 13 centres abroad.
Delhi University professor Abha Dev Habib hailed JNU Vice Chancellor for raising her voice against the CUET format.
“The Delhi University (DU) conducts the DUET which is also based on the MCQ format but the difference is that it is being done by the university, which means that the university has a say in framing the MCQs and deciding on the students it wants and a certain filtering process but with CUET, it will be a one size fits all approach.
“Every university has different postgraduate courses and a different character, which wil be hampered by the CUET. Also technical glitches in CUET-UG have also been a huge letdown for students, who aspire to study in central universities,” she said.
Uninformed change in exam dates, change in centres at the last moment, far off centres and no clarity on retest options — students on second day of CUET’s fourth phase were a worried lot.
Many candidates, who were permitted to reschedule their CUET UG exam to August 30, were shocked to find out that their exams were advanced to Thursday and the centres were far away from their preferred locations.
They also claimed that no intimation was sent to them about change in date.
There was no official word from the University Grants Commission (UGC) and the National Testing Agency (NTA) “My intimation slip mentioned my chosen city as the exam centre city. However, when I got the admit card, I got a centre which is 150 km away and the entry closes at 8.30 am. I have been trying to reach the NTA but no luck yet,” said Neha Singhal, a CUET aspirant.
Another aspirant, Anjali Mishra, said, “Till yesterday afternoon, my admit card showed a different centre and today it’s a different one.
I had no intimation if my centre was changed last minute and have no clue whether I would get an option for retest”.
Nikhil Mishra, said that his admit card was not available till Wednesday night and he was able to download the admission certificate on Thursday morning only to learn that his exam had already begun.
“Till Wednesday, whenever I checked the website, the admit card was not available.
It was made available today (Thursday) morning and the exam centre was two and half hours away from my place,” he said.
Himank Nassa, an aspirant, said that on August 14 a mail was received that exams are scheduled for August 18 and 25.
“On August 16, a notification on the website showed we can either choose to appear for the exam on August 18 or postpone it to August 30 if we want the centre in our desired city. I opted for it and my request was approved. But this morning my admit card showed August 18 and the exam had already begin,” Nassa said.
On Wednesday as well, the exam was cancelled at 13 centres following technical glitches affecting more than 8,600 candidates.
The UGC had announced that the candidates affected on Wednesday will get a chance for retest on August 25.
The CUET is the common gateway for undergraduate admissions to all central universities.
A total of 3.6 lakh candidates are eligible to appear for the fourth phase scheduled from August 17 to August 20.
The exam for additional 11,000 candidates, who were to appear in the fourth phase from August 17-20, has been postponed to August 30 to accommodate their choice of city for centre.
According to the initial plan, all phases of the CUET-UG were scheduled to conclude on August 20.
The NTA, which is responsible for conducting the entrance test, had later announced that all phases of the exam will conclude on August 28.
However, now the schedule has been further deferred and the exam has been split into six phases.
The second phase of CUET was marred by glitches prompting the agency to cancel the exam at various centres.
UGC Chief Jagadesh Kumar had said the exam was cancelled at various centres following indications and reports of “sabotage”.
The exam in second and third phases was also cancelled at centres in Kerala and Itanagar due to rains and landslides.
NEW DELHI: The Common University Entrance Test (CUET) based on multiple choice questions over the decades-old subjective entrance test pattern — academicians are raising doubts over the new examination pattern for post-graduate admissions in Jawaharlal Nehru University.
Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), which sees cutthroat competition in admissions to its masters programmes, fears that the multiple choice questions (MCQ) based test pattern will dilute the quality of students attracted by the varsity.
According to JNU Vice Chancellor Santishree Dhulipudi Pandit, the university has been appealing to the Centre to change the CUET format for postgraduate admissions.
“For masters programmes, we need to test the overall understanding of the subject, opinions and critical thinking besides knowledge. The MCQs have a different testing pattern and aptitude,” she said.
The JNU Teachers Association (JNUTA) had recently moved a resolution demanding that the university suspends its agreement with the National Testing Agency (NTA) and immediately restore JNU’s own time-tested admission procedures.
Previously, the varsity used to admit students to undergraduate courses through subjective exams conducted by it.
From 2019 however, it started admitting students through the JNU Entrance Examination conducted by the NTA.
The university announced earlier this year that it would conduct admissions to all undergraduate and postgraduate courses through the CUET.
“We also need to take into account the unique nature of the university and peculiarity of different centres and the courses offered by them. There is a reason why the university attracts the best talent from across the country and its the selection process,” JNU Professor Bishnupriya Dutt said.
“If we have to provide a level playing field to everyone, CUET-PG can be a subjective exam but to test aspirants of Masters Programmes on basis of a MCQ based exam is not the right metric,” she said.
JNU professor Ayesha Kidwai said that the university had its own entrance test system, which used to analyse students on the basis of their writing skills and their opinion-making capacity.
“JNU has been in existence for over 50 years and the university was holding its entrance for nearly 48 years before the former VC M Jagadesh Kumar, who is now UGC chairman, brought in the JNU Entrance Exam (JNUEE) by tying up with the NTA.
The move not only meant that we lost out on good students but NTA also charged three times the money the university would spend on holding the exam.
“The university, when it was conducting its own exam, also used to make a profit of Rs 1.5 crore, which would then be used by the university tto give Merit Cum means Scholarship to students,” she said.
Kidwai said that the VC should call an Academic Council meeting and withdraw from CUET and she will get the support of the entire teaching community.
The CUET-PG is the new common entrance test for admission to postgraduate programmes at Central universities.
As many as 66 universities, mostly Centre-run, have adopted the computer-based CUET-PG for admissions in the academic session 2022-23.
It will be held in two shifts each on September 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11 in around 500 cities in India and 13 centres abroad.
Delhi University professor Abha Dev Habib hailed JNU Vice Chancellor for raising her voice against the CUET format.
“The Delhi University (DU) conducts the DUET which is also based on the MCQ format but the difference is that it is being done by the university, which means that the university has a say in framing the MCQs and deciding on the students it wants and a certain filtering process but with CUET, it will be a one size fits all approach.
“Every university has different postgraduate courses and a different character, which wil be hampered by the CUET. Also technical glitches in CUET-UG have also been a huge letdown for students, who aspire to study in central universities,” she said.
Uninformed change in exam dates, change in centres at the last moment, far off centres and no clarity on retest options — students on second day of CUET’s fourth phase were a worried lot.
Many candidates, who were permitted to reschedule their CUET UG exam to August 30, were shocked to find out that their exams were advanced to Thursday and the centres were far away from their preferred locations.
They also claimed that no intimation was sent to them about change in date.
There was no official word from the University Grants Commission (UGC) and the National Testing Agency (NTA) “My intimation slip mentioned my chosen city as the exam centre city. However, when I got the admit card, I got a centre which is 150 km away and the entry closes at 8.30 am. I have been trying to reach the NTA but no luck yet,” said Neha Singhal, a CUET aspirant.
Another aspirant, Anjali Mishra, said, “Till yesterday afternoon, my admit card showed a different centre and today it’s a different one.
I had no intimation if my centre was changed last minute and have no clue whether I would get an option for retest”.
Nikhil Mishra, said that his admit card was not available till Wednesday night and he was able to download the admission certificate on Thursday morning only to learn that his exam had already begun.
“Till Wednesday, whenever I checked the website, the admit card was not available.
It was made available today (Thursday) morning and the exam centre was two and half hours away from my place,” he said.
Himank Nassa, an aspirant, said that on August 14 a mail was received that exams are scheduled for August 18 and 25.
“On August 16, a notification on the website showed we can either choose to appear for the exam on August 18 or postpone it to August 30 if we want the centre in our desired city. I opted for it and my request was approved. But this morning my admit card showed August 18 and the exam had already begin,” Nassa said.
On Wednesday as well, the exam was cancelled at 13 centres following technical glitches affecting more than 8,600 candidates.
The UGC had announced that the candidates affected on Wednesday will get a chance for retest on August 25.
The CUET is the common gateway for undergraduate admissions to all central universities.
A total of 3.6 lakh candidates are eligible to appear for the fourth phase scheduled from August 17 to August 20.
The exam for additional 11,000 candidates, who were to appear in the fourth phase from August 17-20, has been postponed to August 30 to accommodate their choice of city for centre.
According to the initial plan, all phases of the CUET-UG were scheduled to conclude on August 20.
The NTA, which is responsible for conducting the entrance test, had later announced that all phases of the exam will conclude on August 28.
However, now the schedule has been further deferred and the exam has been split into six phases.
The second phase of CUET was marred by glitches prompting the agency to cancel the exam at various centres.
UGC Chief Jagadesh Kumar had said the exam was cancelled at various centres following indications and reports of “sabotage”.
The exam in second and third phases was also cancelled at centres in Kerala and Itanagar due to rains and landslides.
