The CBI lawyer further told the court, “When we asked – did you go to Goa and who paid for your stay? He says he doesn’t remember. His stay was paid for through hawala money. We have the entire chain. Who did what, how it happened. We have everything. He goes there 11 times and says he has no recollection. This did not happen 10 years back.”In its allegation, the CBI also contended that Delhi’s excise policy was tweaked to favor the ‘South Group’. The CBI lawyer stated, “We have evidence to show that the South Group dictated what the policy should be like.”He suggested that the new policy was formulated despite the excise commissioner’s report advising against privatizing the liquor business in Delhi. “Then they (the government) asked for public comments (on the policy) and those comments were fabricated. We have evidence to show this,” he added.Alleging that officers who refused to sign the policy were replaced, the CBI lawyer said, “Nothing on the file is missing. When the new officer came, he did the needful.”
Source link
