Additional Advocate General Manish Goyal, appearing for state government, submitted that the petition was not maintainable, as it was based solely on newspapers’ reports. Cuttings of various newspaper reports during the course of the event were produced for making allegations without conducting any research and/or making any effort to find out the factual position in this regard, he added.The court, after hearing all parties concerned observed: “It has been repeatedly laid down by the Supreme Court that a public interest litigation (PIL) petition cannot be based on newspaper reports or the reports in the magazines as the facts contained in the newspaper reports are only hearsay.” The court, while dismissing the petition, observed: “The prayer seeking holding of an inquiry, at this stage, when the event is already over, appears to be an exercise in futility in as much as in case the petitioners, were really concerned about the difficulties being faced by the devotees during 45- day-long event, they should have approached the authorities and/or should have taken recourse to other remedies for obviating their grievances, which has apparently not been done.”
Source link
