In the second application filed by the appellant, he sought a direction for foregoing the police verification report as he had suffered for about eight years.The tribunal, however, rejected the claim on the ground that the appellant had not made the representation to know the fate of the police verification report.The appellant assailed the decision of the tribunal before the Calcutta High Court, which dismissed the case on the ground that the appellant is a Bangladeshi citizen.The top court said the fact that the advertisement was of 1999 and it is 2022 now itself is an impediment to any relief to the appellant.”In case of an advertisement dated 1999, the appellant cannot be permitted to plead that he was waiting for seven long years for getting an appointment letter and then woke up to file the OA before the State Administrative Tribunal.”This itself is a ground to non-suit the appellant. In view of the aforesaid, we are not commenting on the factual correctness of the police verification report, which is sought to be disputed by the appellant. The appeal is accordingly dismissed,” the bench said.
Source link