He also pointed out the weak nature of the allegations, stating, “The accusations—ranging from her failure to respond to a text message, to brief phone calls with one of the other accused, to a vague marital dispute with the deceased—are far from sufficient to establish any criminal intent or conspiracy linking Parvez to the crime.”On 24 January 2025, the Supreme Court had issued a notice to the State of Rajasthan, seeking a detailed response to Parvez’s plea within four weeks.Parvez’s legal team further argued that the investigation was flawed, alleging that key witness statements appeared to be “copy-pasted,” raising questions about their authenticity.”The key statements from the victim’s family and other witnesses are eerily similar, suggesting they were fabricated or coerced to support a predetermined narrative,” the plea stated.The charges against Parvez have also come under scrutiny as the primary motive for the murder appears to be a personal dispute between Tharoth and two other accused individuals—Sanjay Kumar and Vishwas—both of whom have already been granted bail. The chargesheet claims this animosity dates back to a 2017 racing competition involving the three men.Parvez was represented by senior advocates Siddharth Dave and Renjith Marar, along with Tarini K. Nayak and Aaditya Mishra.
Source link
