Delhi Court grants regular bail plea to ex-WFI chief Brij Bhushan Singh in Sexual Harassment Case-

admin

What lies ahead for WFI chief Brij Bhushan after Delhi cops file chargesheet before court?-


Express News Service

NEW DELHI: Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court on Thursday granted regular bail to former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief and BJP MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and suspended WFI assistant secretary Vinod Tomar in the alleged sexual harassment case moved by a group of female grapplers. The order which was reserved earlier in the day was pronounced by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) Harjeet Singh Jaspal.The court said it has imposed certain conditions. “The accused shall directly or indirectly not induce the complainants or witnesses. he shall not leave the country without the permission of the court. Please ensure that all the conditions are scrupulously followed,” the judge ordered.In Singh’s case, the same court had earlier taken cognisance of the offences committed under Sections 354 (outraging modesty), 354A (sexually coloured remarks) and 354D (stalking), 506 (para 1) (criminal intimidation) and 109 (abetment to offence) of the Indian Penal Code while asking him to appear before the court.Co-accused Tomar was charge-sheeted by the Delhi Police for offences under sections 109 (abetment of any offence, if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment), 354, 354-A and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the IPC.

ALSO READ | BJP leader among 15 witnesses testified against WFI chief: CopsDuring the previous hearing on Tuesday, the Additional Public Prosecutor Atul Srivastava submitted that even though the chargesheet (against Singh) has been filed without arrest, he still opposes the bail application.While granting them interim bail from Tuesday to Thursday, in the order, the judge had emphasised that it is bound to follow the Supreme Court order in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs CBI, saying “..the Hon’ble Apex Court has observed that where the offences are punishable with imprisonment of 7 years or less and the chargesheet has been filed without arrest and the accused has cooperated throughout in the investigation including appearing before Investigating Officer whenever called, the bail applications of   such accused on appearance may be decided without the accused being taken in physical custody or by granting interim bail till the bail application is decided..”Notably, the Delhi High Court had on July 7, allowed a minor wrestler to withdraw her plea relating to the hearing of a sexual harassment case against Singh, a six-time MP, by a competent court. The issue arose as the cases related to sexual offences against minors have to be heard by a special court set up under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.The FIRs narrate several alleged instances of sexual harassment like inappropriate touching, groping, stalking and intimidation by Singh at different times and places over a decade.The politician has been questioned by the police twice so far, and on both occasions, he denied all the allegations against him and claimed he was being “framed”.

NEW DELHI: Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court on Thursday granted regular bail to former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief and BJP MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and suspended WFI assistant secretary Vinod Tomar in the alleged sexual harassment case moved by a group of female grapplers.
 
The order which was reserved earlier in the day was pronounced by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) Harjeet Singh Jaspal.
The court said it has imposed certain conditions. “The accused shall directly or indirectly not induce the complainants or witnesses. he shall not leave the country without the permission of the court. Please ensure that all the conditions are scrupulously followed,” the judge ordered.
In Singh’s case, the same court had earlier taken cognisance of the offences committed under Sections 354 (outraging modesty), 354A (sexually coloured remarks) and 354D (stalking), 506 (para 1) (criminal intimidation) and 109 (abetment to offence) of the Indian Penal Code while asking him to appear before the court.
Co-accused Tomar was charge-sheeted by the Delhi Police for offences under sections 109 (abetment of any offence, if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment), 354, 354-A and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the IPC.

ALSO READ | BJP leader among 15 witnesses testified against WFI chief: Cops
During the previous hearing on Tuesday, the Additional Public Prosecutor Atul Srivastava submitted that even though the chargesheet (against Singh) has been filed without arrest, he still opposes the bail application.
While granting them interim bail from Tuesday to Thursday, in the order, the judge had emphasised that it is bound to follow the Supreme Court order in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs CBI, saying “..the Hon’ble Apex Court has observed that where the offences are punishable with imprisonment of 7 years or less and the chargesheet has been filed without arrest and the accused has cooperated throughout in the investigation including appearing before Investigating Officer whenever called, the bail applications of   such accused on appearance may be decided without the accused being taken in physical custody or by granting interim bail till the bail application is decided..”
Notably, the Delhi High Court had on July 7, allowed a minor wrestler to withdraw her plea relating to the hearing of a sexual harassment case against Singh, a six-time MP, by a competent court. The issue arose as the cases related to sexual offences against minors have to be heard by a special court set up under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
The FIRs narrate several alleged instances of sexual harassment like inappropriate touching, groping, stalking and intimidation by Singh at different times and places over a decade.
The politician has been questioned by the police twice so far, and on both occasions, he denied all the allegations against him and claimed he was being “framed”.



Source link